Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

User avatar
Tuscany
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:28 am
Location: near Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Tuscany »

tbully wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:56 am Hello All -

New member here. In the process of purchasing a new (but 2017) R7 with the 430 VP. This thread has gotten me a bit shaken up, sadly. I was under the false impression that all 17's had the new 6.2 with VVT, etc.

However, I do believe the boat I have a deposit on is an early 2017 and likely a 6.0. Obviously the sales terms (price) drives some of this and I'm happy to share that privately. But, if you're put in my position, what would your inclination be? Stick with the '17? Or is the newer tech (and build wait) worth it? It's a well equipped boat for being a dealer stock. The deal is decent but not overwhelmingly, IMO. Thoughts?
This is the difference, and it's quite substantial.

Per VP-
"The new V8 380 has 24 percent quicker acceleration and is 11 percent more fuel efficient than the engine it replaces in the Volvo Penta line. The new V8 430 – the most powerful model in Volvo Penta’s marine gasoline engine lineup – delivers 14 percent faster acceleration and provides 10 percent better fuel economy than its predecessor."

If you plan on a long ownership, you may want to get exactly what you want, along with the latest technology.
For me, I ordered the 6.0l before knowing there would be a new engine redesign coming. Once I found out, I called the factory personally to delay my build if the 6.2l wasn't scheduled for my boat. Luckily, the changeover was happening that week. She guaranteed me the 6.2l. I would have waited an extra month + if need be. After all, the R7 is a big and heavy boat with one engine.

24% quicker acceleration is a 💩Load of improvement. You are paying a 10k performance premium for the 6.0l 430 that comes for free on the quicker 6.2l 380, minus a little top end.

Most importantly, it comes down to delivery options. Do you want to wait and worst scenario, lose the summer? Can you find another boat and have your dealer trade for it? Best scenario, does your dealer have a build slot allotted and available for this summer?
If so, jump all over that one.
Personally, I would try to work a deal to get the new engine.
2017 Cobalt R7
"Cobalt" Blue
6.2L VP 380 or 430

#FARCON Marine
User avatar
Ytmsn
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 5377
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:34 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Ytmsn »

Welcome from Oklahoma tbully. I have no clue which way you should go. I know I'd want the new motor, but if you are buying a leftover 17 you may lose the summer waiting on a build as Tusc said, unless you have a build slot.

And as A7 suggested, go into new members and introduce yourself. When you have questions it'll be easier to go back and find your answers!

Also if you don't purposefully muck-up or derail a thread you'll need to work on those skills some. We're bad ab LOOK! a SQUIRREL!!
2001 262 502 GXI (because it sounds better than an 8.2)
From the Land of the Red Man
"Black Boats Matter"
#FARCON Marine / CC Core!
User avatar
AsLan7
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 11411
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:58 am
Location: Erie PA
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by AsLan7 »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
2002 Cobalt 262
&
2005 Cobalt 263
496 MagHO
(sold )
Erie, PA
Currently boatless (for now)
will fly for food

(CChat moderator)
Cycleman6
Captain
Captain
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:00 pm
Location: Louisville KY
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Cycleman6 »

Just emailed my dealer, modified to VP 6.2L 380 HP. Killed the Merc 6.2L. Hope this was the right decision! :)
2018 R5 (SOLD)
6.2L VP 380HP
Ordering R4 SURF
User avatar
AsLan7
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 11411
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:58 am
Location: Erie PA
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by AsLan7 »

Cycleman6 wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:47 pm Just emailed my dealer, modified to VP 6.2L 380 HP. Killed the Merc 6.2L. Hope this was the right decision! :)
Great to hear CM6!
You won’t regret that decision.

Glad we could be of some help 8-) 👌🏻

... and all that we request in return are some pictures :D
2002 Cobalt 262
&
2005 Cobalt 263
496 MagHO
(sold )
Erie, PA
Currently boatless (for now)
will fly for food

(CChat moderator)
User avatar
Ytmsn
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 5377
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 7:34 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Ytmsn »

Cycledude it was absolutely the right decision! Good for you!
2001 262 502 GXI (because it sounds better than an 8.2)
From the Land of the Red Man
"Black Boats Matter"
#FARCON Marine / CC Core!
User avatar
NautiGirl
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 2841
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:10 pm
Location: Kentucky
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by NautiGirl »

Cycleman6 wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:47 pm Just emailed my dealer, modified to VP 6.2L 380 HP. Killed the Merc 6.2L. Hope this was the right decision! :)
Damn you keep making your (our) boat better and better...good work!
JEFF & KATIE
TeamNAUTI
Ebony Black 2017 R5 8.2 Big Block
CANDIED RED 2007 222 6.2L Merc - Sold
1997 190 4.3 Volvo - Peak Cobalt Design and Manufacturing
KENTUCKY
"Pudgy the had down harder!"
User avatar
Tuscany
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:28 am
Location: near Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Tuscany »

AsLan7 wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:54 pm
Cycleman6 wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 1:47 pm Just emailed my dealer, modified to VP 6.2L 380 HP. Killed the Merc 6.2L. Hope this was the right decision! :)
Great to hear CM6!
You won’t regret that decision.

Glad we could be of some help 8-) 👌🏻

... and all that we request in return are some pictures :D
Good for you.
I tried to tip toe around the subject on your order thread. Such a nice boat on order with such an outdated power plant🙈🙈. I couldn't find a nice way of saying "are you freakin' nuts?"🤣🤣🤣.
Now we're talking boat there brother!
The difference you just spent in the power upgrade will be easier to resell, and the money will be coming back in spades at resale time. Oh, yeah, that the 5 you are buying will now flat out fly...
2017 Cobalt R7
"Cobalt" Blue
6.2L VP 380 or 430

#FARCON Marine
Cycleman6
Captain
Captain
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 6:00 pm
Location: Louisville KY
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Cycleman6 »

[/quote]

Good for you.
I tried to tip toe around the subject on your order thread. Such a nice boat on order with such an outdated power plant🙈🙈. I couldn't find a nice way of saying "are you freakin' nuts?"🤣🤣🤣.
Now we're talking boat there brother!
The difference you just spent in the power upgrade will be easier to resell, and the money will be coming back in spades at resale time. Oh, yeah, that the 5 you are buying will now flat out fly...
[/quote]

Thanks Tuscany. I read alot of your posts, even the ones over on hulltruth. Resale is really important to me, as I tend to replace my vehicles/toys often. So if this gets my higher resale...I'm all IN!
2018 R5 (SOLD)
6.2L VP 380HP
Ordering R4 SURF
User avatar
Joe
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:48 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Joe »

Tuscany wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 12:33 pm
tbully wrote: Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:56 am Hello All -

New member here. In the process of purchasing a new (but 2017) R7 with the 430 VP. This thread has gotten me a bit shaken up, sadly. I was under the false impression that all 17's had the new 6.2 with VVT, etc.

However, I do believe the boat I have a deposit on is an early 2017 and likely a 6.0. Obviously the sales terms (price) drives some of this and I'm happy to share that privately. But, if you're put in my position, what would your inclination be? Stick with the '17? Or is the newer tech (and build wait) worth it? It's a well equipped boat for being a dealer stock. The deal is decent but not overwhelmingly, IMO. Thoughts?
This is the difference, and it's quite substantial.

Per VP-
"The new V8 380 has 24 percent quicker acceleration and is 11 percent more fuel efficient than the engine it replaces in the Volvo Penta line. The new V8 430 – the most powerful model in Volvo Penta’s marine gasoline engine lineup – delivers 14 percent faster acceleration and provides 10 percent better fuel economy than its predecessor."

If you plan on a long ownership, you may want to get exactly what you want, along with the latest technology.
For me, I ordered the 6.0l before knowing there would be a new engine redesign coming. Once I found out, I called the factory personally to delay my build if the 6.2l wasn't scheduled for my boat. Luckily, the changeover was happening that week. She guaranteed me the 6.2l. I would have waited an extra month + if need be. After all, the R7 is a big and heavy boat with one engine.

24% quicker acceleration is a 💩Load of improvement. You are paying a 10k performance premium for the 6.0l 430 that comes for free on the quicker 6.2l 380, minus a little top end.

Most importantly, it comes down to delivery options. Do you want to wait and worst scenario, lose the summer? Can you find another boat and have your dealer trade for it? Best scenario, does your dealer have a build slot allotted and available for this summer?
If so, jump all over that one.
Personally, I would try to work a deal to get the new engine.

If I am not mistaken, the acceleration and fuel efficiency improvements referenced are the same for both the 6.0 and 6.2 when compared to the 8.1Gx1 that these new blocks replace; not that the 6.2 is that much better than the 6.0. I could be wrong and if I am please tell me, but I would love for someone to clarify.
2018 Cobalt R35
Twin Volvo Penta 380's
User avatar
Joe
Lieutenant
Lieutenant
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2018 12:48 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Joe »

2018 Cobalt R35
Twin Volvo Penta 380's
sailor55330
Vice Admiral
Vice Admiral
Posts: 1266
Joined: Thu Feb 01, 2018 4:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by sailor55330 »

This is a great thread. While I don't have a big bad R7 with the 380 or 430, I do have an R3 with the 5.3 and the "underpowered 300hp) I can tell you that if I punch it at 15-20, if you're standing, you better be holding on to something.

Volvo has it figured out and won't regret it.
User avatar
AsLan7
Fleet Admiral
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 11411
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:58 am
Location: Erie PA
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by AsLan7 »

This to me is the interesting part of the article Joe (since we beat the VP 6.2 marinization topic to death)...

.
Couldn’t somebody hack the electronic control module and copy a 380 map to a 350 and score a little extra horsepower? It’s done every day in the car and truck market.

“It could be done, I’d say, but the market volume isn’t there to attract the development of aftermarket programs,” Huddleston said.

And then there’s that warranty question if you mess with Mother Nature.



Or better yet, couldn't someone just copy the 430 HP ECU program and map it to a 380 HP engine since they are identical internally in every way. Now you just saved yourself an $8-10k expense for the 430 horse engine. Yes, the warranty is voided if you do that....but you can certainly buy an add on warranty for a lot less than -- $8,000!

.
Last edited by AsLan7 on Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2002 Cobalt 262
&
2005 Cobalt 263
496 MagHO
(sold )
Erie, PA
Currently boatless (for now)
will fly for food

(CChat moderator)
User avatar
Tuscany
Admiral
Admiral
Posts: 3476
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:28 am
Location: near Buffalo, NY
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by Tuscany »

VP carefully refers the to last generation 6.0L with the term "the engine it replaces". This way, they can directly compare the 6.2L upgrade (indirectly) without directly slamming the prior 6.0L. :D :D Something like that..
So the 6.2L 380 has 24% more acceleration and 11% more fuel economy over the (6.0L 380) engine it replaces.
Last edited by Tuscany on Fri Mar 16, 2018 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2017 Cobalt R7
"Cobalt" Blue
6.2L VP 380 or 430

#FARCON Marine
tbully
Commander
Commander
Posts: 193
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2018 11:51 am
Location: Canton, MI
Contact:

Re: Mercruiser 6.2L Versus VP 6.2L

Post by tbully »

Thanks again, all.

I spoke with my salesman. He is "supportive" of me waiting for the 6.2. They do have buildslots for later this summer (2019) which means I'll miss a good part of our (short) summer here in MI. But, I know myself. Waiting is probably better.

With that said, the deal on the 17 was pretty darn good compared to what I just priced out on the website! :shock: I'll have to consider if the 430 (vs. 380), Captain's Choice, and the tower are worth it. That's what's quickly driving up the costs.

I'll introduce myself officially in the other thread in time. But it looks like I'll be waiting a few months.

Oh look! Another squirrel! BRB!
2017 R7 6.0 430 VP
2019 R7 6.2 430 VP
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 0 guests